Premium
Negotiating quality standards for effective delivery of labor and childbirth care in Nigeria and Uganda
Author(s) -
Oladapo Olufemi T.,
Bohren Meghan A.,
Fawole Bukola,
Mugerwa Kidza,
Ojelade Olubunmi A.,
Titiloye Musibau A.,
Alu Francis E.,
Mambya Musana O.,
Oyeneyin Lawal,
Bataale Salim,
Akintan Adesina,
Alabi Olubunmi,
Adebayo Amos,
Okike Ola,
Idris Hadiza A.,
Wilfred Sanni,
Bello Halima,
Kyaddondo David,
Olutayo Akinpelu O.,
Byamugisha Josaphat,
Souza Joao Paulo,
Gülmezoglu A. Metin
Publication year - 2017
Publication title -
international journal of gynecology and obstetrics
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.895
H-Index - 97
eISSN - 1879-3479
pISSN - 0020-7292
DOI - 10.1002/ijgo.12398
Subject(s) - childbirth , medicine , negotiation , nursing , quality (philosophy) , health care , audit , process (computing) , service delivery framework , public relations , process management , service (business) , business , marketing , economic growth , pregnancy , philosophy , genetics , accounting , epistemology , political science , computer science , law , biology , operating system , economics
Objective “Negotiated standards” describe a level of quality of care that is acceptable and achievable within a specific health system, based on consensus between key stakeholders. This paper presents the development of negotiated standards for effective labor and childbirth care in selected hospitals and communities in Nigeria and Uganda. Methods A four‐step development process involving different methodologies. The process included: (1) review and synthesis of internationally recognized intrapartum clinical principles and practices; (2) primary qualitative research to assess values and preferences of women and healthcare providers, and practices that align with these preferences; (3) draft contextualization of effective and ineffective behaviors to reflect values and preferences; and (4) WHO ‐mediated negotiations between relevant stakeholders, including community members, providers, and administrators. Results The primary outcomes of this process were a comprehensive set of effective behaviors and clinical practices covering the main domains of quality of care, which are practical and easy to communicate, implement, and audit across all levels of healthcare delivery. Conclusion The process demonstrates that health facilities and providers can be motivated to adopt standards of care that uphold the values and preferences of both service users and providers, while adhering to international best practices.