Premium
The responsibility of gynecologists and obstetricians in providing safe abortion services within the limits of the law
Author(s) -
Faúndes Anibal
Publication year - 2017
Publication title -
international journal of gynecology and obstetrics
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.895
H-Index - 97
eISSN - 1879-3479
pISSN - 0020-7292
DOI - 10.1002/ijgo.12261
Subject(s) - medicine , abortion , conscientious objector , duty , harm , law , abortion law , unsafe abortion , family planning , family medicine , environmental health , pregnancy , population , genetics , spanish civil war , political science , research methodology , biology
Abstract Approximately 47 000 women die each year worldwide as a result of the complications of unsafe abortion, almost exclusively in low‐ and middle‐income countries with restrictive abortion laws. In these countries, very few women who comply with the conditions imposed by the law can access safe abortion services in the public health system. The main obstacle is the unwillingness of gynecologists and obstetricians to provide abortion services by claiming conscientious objection, which is often used to hide their fear of the stigma associated with abortion. This happens because many colleagues are unaware that without access to legal services these women will resort to an unsafe abortion and its consequences. This violates the statement from FIGO 's Committee for the Ethical Aspects of Human Reproduction and Women's Health, which asserts that: “The primary conscientious duty of obstetrician–gynecologists is at all times to treat, or provide benefit and prevent harm, to the patients for whose care they are responsible. Any conscientious objection to treating a patient is secondary to this primary duty.”