z-logo
Premium
Prevalence of gestational diabetes mellitus evaluated by universal screening with a 75‐g, 2‐hour oral glucose tolerance test and IADPSG criteria
Author(s) -
Karcaaltincaba Deniz,
Calis Pinar,
Ocal Nagehan,
Ozek Aykut,
Altug Inan Melis,
Bayram Merih
Publication year - 2017
Publication title -
international journal of gynecology and obstetrics
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.895
H-Index - 97
eISSN - 1879-3479
pISSN - 0020-7292
DOI - 10.1002/ijgo.12205
Subject(s) - medicine , gestational diabetes , confidence interval , diabetes mellitus , obstetrics , pregnancy , logistic regression , cross sectional study , glucose tolerance test , gestation , gynecology , endocrinology , insulin resistance , genetics , pathology , biology
Objective To determine the prevalence of gestational diabetes mellitus ( GDM ) and its association with maternal age among Turkish women diagnosed by International Association of Diabetes and Pregnancy Study Group ( IADPSG ) criteria. Methods A cross‐sectional study was conducted in 2013–2015 among non‐diabetic pregnant women aged 18–49 years who were universally screened for GDM by IADPSG criteria. The percentage of women meeting each diagnostic threshold and the prevalence of GDM by age group were calculated. Linear trends were evaluated by logistic regression. Results Among 1434 women screened, 159 (11.1%, 95% confidence interval 9.5%–12.7%) were diagnosed with GDM ; eleven of these women had been diagnosed according to a fasting glucose level in the first trimester. The prevalence of GDM was 6.6% (10/151), 7.3% (37/507), 8.8% (42/479), 16.7% (45/270), and 35.2% (25/71) among women aged younger than 25, 25–29, 30–34, 35–39, and 40 years or older, respectively. GDM prevalence increased with age ( P <0.001). The numbers of women diagnosed with GDM in the second trimester who exceeded one, two, and three thresholds of the 2‐hour oral glucose tolerance test were 66 (44.6%), 52 (35.1%), and 30 (20.3%), respectively. Conclusion Prevalence of GDM was correlated with maternal age. Most women diagnosed in the second trimester exceeded the threshold at only one of the three timepoints.

This content is not available in your region!

Continue researching here.

Having issues? You can contact us here