Premium
Association between timing of elective cesarean delivery and adverse outcomes among women with at least two previous cesareans
Author(s) -
Hamadneh Jehan,
Alchalabi Haifaa,
Hamadneh Shereen,
Amarin Zouhair,
Khader Yousef S.,
Kassab Manal,
BaniHani Mahmoud
Publication year - 2017
Publication title -
international journal of gynecology and obstetrics
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.895
H-Index - 97
eISSN - 1879-3479
pISSN - 0020-7292
DOI - 10.1002/ijgo.12089
Subject(s) - medicine , odds ratio , confidence interval , respiratory distress , obstetrics , pregnancy , tertiary referral hospital , retrospective cohort study , jaundice , surgery , genetics , biology
Objective To assess the impact of delivery at 37 weeks of pregnancy versus 38 weeks or later on maternal and neonatal outcomes among women with multiple previous cesareans. Methods In a retrospective study, data were assessed from women with at least two previous cesareans who delivered by cesarean at 37 weeks of pregnancy or later at a tertiary referral hospital in Jordan between January 2013 and November 2015. Results Among 886 eligible women, 505 (57.0%) delivered at 37 weeks (group 1) and 381 (43.0%) delivered at 38 weeks or later (group 2). There was no difference in intraoperative or postoperative complications between the two groups. In multivariate analysis, women in group 2 had lower odds of delivering neonates with respiratory distress syndrome than did those in group 1 (adjusted odds ratio 0.3, 95% confidence interval 0.2–0.5; P= 0.046). However, neonatal jaundice was more common in group 2 (adjusted odds ratio 2.1, 95% confidence interval 1.7–2.7; P= 0.035). Conclusion Among women with multiple cesareans, delivery at 37 weeks was associated with increased risk of neonatal respiratory morbidity and decreased risk of neonatal jaundice, but not with a reduction in maternal complications, as compared with delivery at 38 weeks or later.