Premium
Hypofractionated volumetric‐modulated arc therapy for breast cancer: A propensity‐score‐weighted comparison of radiation‐related toxicity
Author(s) -
Kim Nalee,
Chang Jee Suk,
Shah Chirag,
Shin Hyejung,
Keum Ki Chang,
Suh ChangOk,
Kim Yong Bae
Publication year - 2021
Publication title -
international journal of cancer
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 2.475
H-Index - 234
eISSN - 1097-0215
pISSN - 0020-7136
DOI - 10.1002/ijc.33525
Subject(s) - medicine , radiation therapy , breast cancer , nuclear medicine , cumulative incidence , dose fractionation , toxicity , urology , cancer , cohort
We assessed the clinical benefit of combining volumetric‐modulated arc therapy (VMAT) and hypofractionated radiotherapy (HF‐RT) considering the incidence of radiation‐related toxicities. After a retrospective review for breast cancer patients treated with adjuvant RT between 2005 and 2017, a total of 4209 patients treated with three‐dimensional conventional fractionation (CF‐3D, 50.4 Gy/28 fractions) and 1540 patients treated with HF‐RT (768 received HF‐3D; 772, HF‐VMAT; 40 Gy/15 fractions) were included. A total of 2229 patients (38.8%) received regional node irradiation (RNI): 1642 (39.0%), 167 (21.7%) and 420 (54.4%) received RNI via CF‐3D, HF‐3D and HF‐VMAT, respectively. Acute/subacute and late toxicities were evaluated. Propensity scores were calculated via logistic regression. Grade 2+ acute/subacute toxicities was the highest in CF‐3D group (15.0%, 2.6% and 1.6% in CF‐3D, HF‐3D and HF‐VMAT, respectively; P < .001). HF‐VMAT reduced Grade 2+ acute/subacute toxicities significantly compared to CF‐3D (odds ratio [OR] 0.11, P < .001) and HF‐3D (OR 0.45, P = .010). The 3‐year cumulative rate of late toxicities was 18.0% (20.1%, 10.9% and 13.4% in CF‐3D, HF‐3D and HF‐VMAT, respectively; P < .001). On sensitivity analysis, the benefit of HF‐VMAT was high in the RNI group. Acute and late toxicities were fewer after HF‐VMAT than after HF‐3D or CF‐3D, especially in women who underwent RNI.