Premium
Randomized Phase II trial of combination chemotherapy with panitumumab or bevacizumab for patients with inoperable biliary tract cancer without KRAS exon 2 mutations
Author(s) -
Amin Nadia Emad Lotfi,
Hansen Torben Frøstrup,
Fernebro Eva,
Ploen John,
Eberhard Jakob,
Lindebjerg Jan,
Jensen Lars Henrik
Publication year - 2021
Publication title -
international journal of cancer
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 2.475
H-Index - 234
eISSN - 1097-0215
pISSN - 0020-7136
DOI - 10.1002/ijc.33509
Subject(s) - bevacizumab , panitumumab , medicine , oxaliplatin , gemcitabine , chemotherapy , capecitabine , gastroenterology , clinical endpoint , kras , phases of clinical research , colorectal cancer , oncology , progression free survival , surgery , cancer , randomized controlled trial
Biliary tract cancers (BTC) are rare and often diagnosed in late stages with advanced, nonresectable disease. The targeted agents panitumumab and bevacizumab have shown promising outcomes in combination with chemotherapy in other gastrointestinal (GI) cancers. We wanted to investigate if panitumumab or bevacizumab was the most promising drug to add to chemotherapy. Eighty‐eight patients were randomized to combination chemotherapy supplemented by either panitumumab 6 mg/kg or bevacizumab 10 mg/kg on Day 1 in Arm A and Arm B, respectively. All patients received gemcitabine 1000 mg/m 2 on Day 1, oxaliplatin 60 mg/m 2 on Day 1 and capecitabine 1000 mg/m 2 twice daily from Days 1 to 7. Treatment was repeated every 2 weeks until progression or for a maximum of 6 months. At progression, crossover was made to the other treatment arm. The primary endpoint was progression‐free survival (PFS) at 6 months. With 19 of 45 in Arm A and 23 of 43 in Arm B PFS at 6 months, the primary endpoint was not met. The overall response rate (ORR) was 45% vs 20% ( P = .03), median PFS was 6.1 months vs 8.2 months ( P = .13) and median overall survival (OS) was 9.5 months vs 12.3 months ( P = .47) in Arm A and Arm B, respectively. Our study showed no consistent differences between adding panitumumab or bevacizumab to chemotherapy in nonresectable BTC and none of the two regimens qualify for testing in Phase III. However, we found a higher response rate in the panitumumab arm with potential implication for future trials in the neoadjuvant setting.