Premium
FAK alternative splice mRNA variants expression pattern in colorectal cancer
Author(s) -
Devaud Christel,
TilkinMariamé AnneFrançoise,
VignolleVidoni Alix,
Souleres Philippine,
DenadaiSouza Alexandre,
Rolland Corinne,
Duthoit Christine,
Blanpied Catherine,
Chabot Sophie,
Bouillé Pascale,
Lluel Philippe,
Vergnolle Nathalie,
RacaudSultan Claire,
Ferrand Audrey
Publication year - 2019
Publication title -
international journal of cancer
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 2.475
H-Index - 234
eISSN - 1097-0215
pISSN - 0020-7136
DOI - 10.1002/ijc.32120
Subject(s) - colorectal cancer , splice , cancer research , messenger rna , alternative splicing , biology , medicine , oncology , cancer , computational biology , pathology , genetics , gene
The Focal adhesion kinase (FAK) is a ubiquitous cytoplasmic tyrosine‐kinase promoting tumor progression and metastasis processes by acting in cancer cells and their tumor microenvironment partners. FAK overexpression in primary colon tumors and their metastasis is associated to poor colorectal cancer (CRC) patients’ outcome. Eight FAK mRNA alternative splice variants have been described and contribute to additional level of FAK activity regulation, some of them corresponding to overactivated FAK isoforms. To date, FAK mRNA alternative splice variants expression and implication in CRC processes remain unknown. Here, using different human CRC cells lines displaying differential invasive capacities in an in vivo murine model recapitulating the different steps of CRC development from primary tumors to liver and lung metastasis, we identified three out of the eight mRNA variants (namely FAK 0 , FAK 28 and FAK 6 ) differentially expressed along the CRC process and the tumor sites. Our results highlight an association between FAK 0 and FAK 6 expressions and the metastatic potential of the most aggressive cell lines HT29 and HCT116, suggesting that FAK 0 and FAK 6 could represent aggressiveness markers in CRC. Our findings also suggest a more specific role for FAK 28 in the interactions between the tumors cells and their microenvironment. In conclusion, targeting FAK 0 , the common form of FAK, might not be a good strategy based on the numerous roles of this kinase in physiological processes. In contrast, FAK 6 or FAK 28 splice variants, or their corresponding protein isoforms, may putatively represent future therapeutic target candidates in the development of CRC primary tumors and metastasis.