Premium
Variations in the expression of cell‐adhesion molecules on liver‐associated lymphocytes and peripheral‐blood lymphocytes in patients with and without liver metastasis
Author(s) -
GarcíaBarcina María,
Bidaurrazaga Ioseba,
Neaud Véronique,
BioulacSage Paulette,
Balabaud Charles,
VidalVanaclocha Fernando,
Winnock María
Publication year - 1995
Publication title -
international journal of cancer
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 2.475
H-Index - 234
eISSN - 1097-0215
pISSN - 0020-7136
DOI - 10.1002/ijc.2910610408
Subject(s) - cd49b , cell adhesion molecule , immunoglobulin superfamily , lymphocyte , population , integrin , pathology , biology , flow cytometry , cd11c , integrin alpha m , cell adhesion , metastasis , cd11a , immunology , antigen , cd18 , microbiology and biotechnology , cell , cd8 , medicine , phenotype , cancer , interleukin 21 , biochemistry , environmental health , gene , genetics
We evaluated the expression of the cell‐adhesion molecules (CAM) that might be involved in liver‐associated lymphocyte (LAL) contacts with other sinusoidal cells and/or be responsible for natural‐killer(NK)‐ and lymphokine‐activated killer(LAK) activity in patients with liver metastasis. The LAL population was isolated by sinusoidal high‐pressure lavage from partial hepatectomies obtained from patients operated for metastases (n = 13) and benign liver tumors (n = 9). Surface expression of the beta‐2‐integrin chains (CD11a, CD11b, CD11c and CD 18), and the beta‐1‐integrin chains (CD49b, CD49d, CD49f and CD29), as well as that of members of the immunoglobulin superfamily (CD2, CD54, CD56 and CD58), were analyzed by one‐ or two‐color flow cytometry. Quantitative and qualitative differences were observed in both groups of patients in the expression of CAM between LAL and peripheral blood lymphocytes (PBL). LAL were characterized by an increase in the percentage of CD11b‐, CD49b‐, CD49d‐, CD54‐, CD56‐ and CD58‐positive cells in comparison with PBL. Fluorescence values for CD2, CD11a, CD18 and CD56 were higher in LAL than in PBL. Moreover, the population expressing these antigens of differentiation presented a bimodal distribution (dim and bright): in LAL, as opposed to PBL, the percentage of cells with a bright phenotype was greater than of those with a dim one. The increase in CAM expression on LAL could be due to the influence of the liver sinusoidal micro‐environment. Results were more unexpected for the comparison between benign and malignant tumors. No difference was found in CAM expression on LAL between these 2 categories. Consequently, it cannot be this factor that explains the decrease in LAK activity of LAL in patients with metastasis. © 1995 Wiley‐Liss, Inc .