Premium
Prognostic factors in renal‐cell carcinoma: Immunohistochemical detection of p53 protein versus clinico‐pathological parameters
Author(s) -
But Fredrik J.,
Godschalk Josian C. J.,
Krishnadath Kausilia K.,
Van Kwast Theo H. M. Der,
Bosman Fred T.
Publication year - 1994
Publication title -
international journal of cancer
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 2.475
H-Index - 234
eISSN - 1097-0215
pISSN - 0020-7136
DOI - 10.1002/ijc.2910570504
Subject(s) - immunohistochemistry , pathological , renal cell carcinoma , stage (stratigraphy) , pathology , carcinoma , p53 protein , medicine , clear cell , oncology , biology , paleontology
Immunoreactivity forp53 protein was assessed in 100 cases of primary renal‐cell carcinoma (RCC). The results were correlated with clinical survival data (follow‐up 24 to 84 months: mean: 39 months) and with clinico‐pathological parameters, including nuclear grade, tumour stage, cell type, tumour architecture and tumour diameter. In all, 32% of the tumours were p53‐positive; there was no difference in survival between p53‐positive and ‐negative cases. Similarly, p53 expression did not correlate with any of the clinico‐pathological parameters mentioned. Nuclear grade (grade 1 + 2 vs. grade 3 + 4) had a striking impact on prognosis and so, to a lesser extent, did tumour stage and the occurrence of a spindle‐cell component. The immunohistochemical detection of p53 in RCC is not of prognostic value. The estimation of nuclear grade, however is a major predictor of prognosis.
Accelerating Research
Robert Robinson Avenue,
Oxford Science Park, Oxford
OX4 4GP, United Kingdom
Address
John Eccles HouseRobert Robinson Avenue,
Oxford Science Park, Oxford
OX4 4GP, United Kingdom