z-logo
Premium
Autologous mixed lymphocyte‐tumor reaction and autologous mixed lymphocyte reaction. I. Proliferation of two distinct T‐cell subsets
Author(s) -
Uchida Atsushi,
Moore Michael,
Klein Eva
Publication year - 1987
Publication title -
international journal of cancer
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 2.475
H-Index - 234
eISSN - 1097-0215
pISSN - 0020-7136
DOI - 10.1002/ijc.2910400207
Subject(s) - mixed lymphocyte reaction , t lymphocyte , cd8 , immunology , monoclonal antibody , percoll , lymphocyte , biology , cytotoxic t cell , t cell , microbiology and biotechnology , in vitro , antibody , immune system , biochemistry
In patients with carcinomatous pleural effusions blood T lymphocytes proliferated in vitro in response to autologous, freshly isolated effusion tumor cells in the autologous mixed lymphocyte‐tumor culture (AMLTC) and to autologous blood non‐T cells in the autologous mixed lymphocyte culture (AMLC). Treatment of the stimulator cells with the anti‐HLA‐DR monoclonal antibody (MAb) abrogated the stimulatory capacity in AMLC, but not in AMLTC. A subset of T cells that formed rosettes with autologous erythrocytes showed proliferative response to autologous non‐malignant cells, whereas this subset did not respond to autologous tumor cells. Non‐adherent lymphocytes were fractionated by centrifugation on discontinuous Percoll density gradients. Medium‐sized T lymphocytes were excellent responders in AMLC, but were weak responders in AMLTC. Small T lymphocytes proliferated preferentially in AMLTC, but responded poorly in AMLC. Large granular lymphocytes (LGL) did not proliferate in mixed cultures of either type. Instead, LGL suppressed the T‐cell proliferation in AMLTC. The same suppressor LGL, however, had no inhibitory effect on AMLC. Elimination of the CD4 subset reduced or abolished proliferative response in AMLC in all cases, whereas it was ineffective in diminishing the reaction in 6 of 8 AMLTC. In contrast, removal of the CD8 subset decreased or eliminated T‐cell proliferation in 4 of 8 AMLTC, but in none of the AMLC. These results indicate that the auto reactive T lymphocytes detectable in response to tumor cells and non‐malignant non‐T cells differ in several characteristics. Thus, the reaction in the AMLTC is not due to contaminating non‐malignant cells in the stimulator population and may be a tumor‐induced prolixferative response.

This content is not available in your region!

Continue researching here.

Having issues? You can contact us here