Premium
Differential inhibition of epstein‐barr virus induction by the amino acid analogue, L‐canavanine
Author(s) -
Yamamoto Naoki,
MuellerLantzsch Nikolaus,
Hausen Harald Zur
Publication year - 1980
Publication title -
international journal of cancer
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 2.475
H-Index - 234
eISSN - 1097-0215
pISSN - 0020-7136
DOI - 10.1002/ijc.2910250403
Subject(s) - canavanine , epstein–barr virus , virus , virology , differential (mechanical device) , amino acid , biology , chemistry , biochemistry , arginine , physics , thermodynamics
Abstract The effect of an amino acid analogue, L‐canavanine, on the synthesis of Epstein‐Barr virus (EBV) antigens was investigated in lymphoblastoid cells. The analysis revealed that after infection of BJAB and NC‐37 cells with P3HR‐I EBV synthesis of early antigen (EA) was not affected by canavanine in concentrations up to 8.4 mM. The synthesis of EBV‐determined nuclear antigen (EBNA) and of viral capsid antigen (VCA) was significantly inhibited at concentrations higher than 2.8 mM. Spontaneous induction of EA in P3HR‐I cells was not affected by canavanine. On the other hand, EA induction by the tumor promoter TPA, by iododeoxyuridine (IdUrd), by antiserum to human IgM and by n‐butyric acid was clearly inhibited by this treatment. Application of 0.3 mM canavanine resulted in more than 95% inhibition of EA induction by TPA. Under these conditions cell growth and incorporation of radiolabelled amino acids into an acid‐insoluble fraction was significantly impaired. Differential treatment of the cells with canavanine established that EA induction was completely suppressed when the cells were treated concomitantly with canavanine and TPA. Subsequent treatment with canavanine after prior exposure to TPA resulted in some viral antigen induction depending on the time period of TPA exposure. Pretreatment of the cells overnight with canavanine followed by washing and addition of the tumor promoter did not suppress EA induction by TPA. These data support the concept that EA induction by superinfection follows a different pathway from antigen induction by chemical inducers.