z-logo
Premium
Immunoprophylaxis and immunotherapy for a murine fibrosarcoma with C. Granulosum and C. Parvum
Author(s) -
Milas Luka,
Gutterman Jordan U.,
Bašić Ivan,
Hunter Nancy,
Mavligit Giora M.,
Hersh Evan M.,
Withers H. Rodney
Publication year - 1974
Publication title -
international journal of cancer
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 2.475
H-Index - 234
eISSN - 1097-0215
pISSN - 0020-7136
DOI - 10.1002/ijc.2910140409
Subject(s) - fibrosarcoma , subcutaneous injection , inoculation , immunotherapy , medicine , subcutaneous tissue , lung , pathology , immunology , immune system
Prophylactic and therapeutic effectiveness of killed C. granulosum and C. parvum bacteria was investigated against a methylcholanthrene‐induced fibrosarcoma in syngeneic C 3 Hf/Bu mice. Subcutaneous or intravenous treatment of mice with 0.25 mg of these bacteria greatly reduced the number of tumor nodules (metastases, colonies) in the lung generated by 10 5 or 10 6 fibrosarcoma cells inoculated intravenously 7 days later. The treatment also prolonged the survival of tumor‐cell recipients, and to some mice afforded complete protection against tumor growth. Number of lung metastases and survival of the recipients were more affected by intravenous than by subcutaneous treatment with the bacteria. Given intravenously to mice 3 days after intravenous inoculation of 2×10 5 fibrosarcoma cells, these non‐specific immunostimulants significantly reduced the number of pulmonary colonies and prolonged survival of mice. In contrast, subcutaneous application of the bacteria was only slightly effective. Both C. granulosum and C. parvum administered intravenously to mice 3 days following subcutaneous injection of 4×10 5 fibrosarcoma cells did not affect the development of subcutaneous tumors. However, when the tumors had grown to 25‐17 mm in diameter 67% and 80% of them underwent complete and lasting regressions in mice treated with C. granulosum and C. parvum, respectively. C. granulosum and C. parvum were approximately equally effective against both intravenously and subcutaneously injected tumor cells.

This content is not available in your region!

Continue researching here.

Having issues? You can contact us here