Premium
Serum DNA methylation for monitoring response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy in breast cancer patients
Author(s) -
Avraham Ayelet,
Uhlmann Ronit,
Shperber Aino,
Birnbaum Miriam,
Sandbank Judith,
Sella Avishay,
Sukumar Saraswati,
Evron Ella
Publication year - 2012
Publication title -
international journal of cancer
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 2.475
H-Index - 234
eISSN - 1097-0215
pISSN - 0020-7136
DOI - 10.1002/ijc.27526
Subject(s) - medicine , breast cancer , chemotherapy , methylation , dna methylation , oncology , pathological , complete response , neoadjuvant therapy , cancer , biology , dna , biochemistry , gene expression , gene , genetics
Abstract Patients with large or nonoperable breast cancers often receive neoadjuvant chemotherapy to facilitate full resection of the tumor and enable conservation of the breast. However, currently available methods for evaluation of response during therapy are limited and the actual effect of the treatment is only recognized at surgery upon completion of chemotherapy. Timely assessment of response could allow individual tailoring of the treatment and save noneffective drugs and unnecessary toxicity. Here, we suggest that tumor derived DNA methylation in the serum may reflect changes in tumor burden and allow early recognition of responders versus nonresponders. In this pilot study, we collected 7 consecutive serum samples from 52 patients with locally advanced breast cancer during neoadjuvant chemotherapy. We selected RASSF1 , which was methylated in more than 80% of the tumors, for serum analysis. Using the “methylation sensitive PCR and high resolution melting,” we detected RASSF1 methylation in the serum of 21 patients prior to therapy. In four patients who achieved complete pathological response, RASSF1 methylation in the serum became undetectable early during therapy. In contrast, in 17 patients that had partial or minimal pathological response, serum RASSF1 methylation persisted longer or throughout the treatment (complete versus partial response p = 0.02). These findings support further development of this assay for monitoring response during neoadjuvant therapy.