Premium
A microdosing approach for characterizing formation and repair of carboplatin–DNA monoadducts and chemoresistance
Author(s) -
Henderson Paul T.,
Li Tao,
He Miaoling,
Zhang Hongyong,
Malfatti Michael,
Gandara David,
Grimminger Peter P.,
Danenberg Kathleen D.,
Beckett Laurel,
de Vere White Ralph W.,
Turteltaub Kenneth W.,
Pan ChongXian
Publication year - 2011
Publication title -
international journal of cancer
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 2.475
H-Index - 234
eISSN - 1097-0215
pISSN - 0020-7136
DOI - 10.1002/ijc.25814
Subject(s) - carboplatin , adduct , dna , dna repair , dna damage , chemistry , intracellular , cell culture , cancer research , efflux , pharmacology , microbiology and biotechnology , cisplatin , biochemistry , biology , chemotherapy , genetics , organic chemistry
Formation and repair of platinum (Pt)‐induced DNA adducts is a critical step in Pt drug‐mediated cytotoxicity. Measurement of Pt–DNA adduct kinetics in tumors may be useful for better understanding chemoresistance and therapeutic response. However, this concept has yet to be rigorously tested because of technical challenges in measuring the adducts at low concentrations and consistent access to sufficient tumor biopsy material. Ultrasensitive accelerator mass spectrometry was used to detect [ 14 C]carboplatin–DNA monoadducts at the attomole level, which are the precursors to Pt–DNA crosslink formation, in six cancer cell lines as a proof‐of‐concept. The most resistant cells had the lowest monoadduct levels at all time points over 24 hr. [ 14 C]Carboplatin “microdoses” (1/100th the pharmacologically effective concentration) had nearly identical adduct formation and repair kinetics compared to therapeutically relevant doses, suggesting that the microdosing approach can potentially be used to determine the pharmacological effects of therapeutic treatment. Some of the possible chemoresistance mechanisms were also studied, such as drug uptake/efflux, intracellular inactivation and DNA repair in selected cell lines. Intracellular inactivation and efficient DNA repair each contributed significantly to the suppression of DNA monoadduct formation in the most resistant cell line compared to the most sensitive cell line studied ( p < 0.001). Nucleotide excision repair (NER)‐deficient and ‐proficient cells showed substantial differences in carboplatin monoadduct concentrations over 24 hr that likely contributed to chemoresistance. The data support the utility of carboplatin microdosing as a translatable approach for defining carboplatin–DNA monoadduct formation and repair, possibly by NER, which may be useful for characterizing chemoresistance in vivo .