Premium
LINE‐1 hypomethylation is inversely associated with microsatellite instability and CpG island methylator phenotype in colorectal cancer
Author(s) -
Ogino Shuji,
Kawasaki Takako,
Nosho Katsuhiko,
Ohnishi Mutsuko,
Suemoto Yuko,
Kirkner Gregory J.,
Fuchs Charles S.
Publication year - 2008
Publication title -
international journal of cancer
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 2.475
H-Index - 234
eISSN - 1097-0215
pISSN - 0020-7136
DOI - 10.1002/ijc.23470
Subject(s) - microsatellite instability , mlh1 , dna methylation , methylation , biology , cdkn2a , cpg site , cancer research , population , colorectal cancer , genetics , cancer , microbiology and biotechnology , dna mismatch repair , microsatellite , medicine , gene , gene expression , allele , environmental health
Abstract The CpG island methylator phenotype (CIMP) with widespread promoter CpG island methylation is a phenotype in colorectal cancer, associated with microsatellite instability (MSI) and BRAF mutation. Genome‐wide hypomethylation may also play an important role in genomic instability. However, the relation between global DNA methylation level and methylation in individual CpG islands remains uncertain. Utilizing 869 population‐based colorectal cancers, we measured long interspersed nucleotide element‐1 (LINE‐1) methylation level by Pyrosequencing, which correlates with global DNA methylation level. We quantified DNA methylation in 8 CIMP‐specific promoters ( CACNA1G , CDKN2A (p16), CRABP1 , IGF2 , MLH1 , NEUROG1 , RUNX3 and SOCS1 ) by real‐time PCR (MethyLight technology). LINE‐1 methylation levels in tumors were approximately normally distributed (mean, 61.4%; median, 62.3%; standard deviation, 9.6%). Among the 869 tumors, 128 (15%) were classified as CIMP‐high (≥6/8 methylated promoters). The mean LINE‐1 methylation level was higher in CIMP‐high tumors (65.1%, p < 0.0001) than non‐CIMP‐high tumors (60.7%), and higher in MSI‐high tumors (64.7%, p < 0.0001) than non‐MSI‐high tumors (60.7%). When tumors were stratified by MSI/CIMP status, compared to non‐MSI‐high non‐CIMP‐high tumors (mean LINE‐1 methylation level, 60.4%), the mean LINE‐1 methylation level was higher in MSI‐high CIMP‐high (64.8%, p < 0.0001), MSI‐high non‐CIMP‐high (64.6%, p = 0.03) and non‐MSI‐high CIMP‐high tumors (66.1%, p = 0.0003). In addition, 18q loss of heterozygosity in non‐MSI‐high tumors was correlated with LINE‐1 hypomethylation ( p = 0.004). In conclusion, both CIMP‐high and MSI‐high are inversely associated with LINE‐1 hypomethylation, suggesting that CIMP/MSI and genomic hypomethylation may represent different pathways to colorectal cancer. Our data also support a possible link between global hypomethylation and chromosomal instability. © 2008 Wiley‐Liss, Inc.