z-logo
Premium
SET complex in serous epithelial ovarian cancer
Author(s) -
Ouellet Véronique,
Page Cécile Le,
Guyot MarieClaude,
Lussier Christian,
Tonin Patricia N.,
Provencher Diane M.,
MesMasson AnneMarie
Publication year - 2006
Publication title -
international journal of cancer
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 2.475
H-Index - 234
eISSN - 1097-0215
pISSN - 0020-7136
DOI - 10.1002/ijc.22054
Subject(s) - serous fluid , immunohistochemistry , ovarian cancer , context (archaeology) , disease , cancer research , cancer , biology , stage (stratigraphy) , medicine , oncology , pathology , paleontology
With low cure rates but increasing diverse treatment options that provide variable remission times, ovarian cancer is increasingly being recognized as a chronic disease. This reality indicates the need for a better understanding of factors influencing disease progression. In a previous global analysis of gene expression, we identified genes differentially expressed when comparing serous epithelial ovarian tumors of low and high malignant potential (grade 0 vs grade 3). In this analysis, 4 out of 5 members of the SET complex, SET, APE1, NM23 and HMGB2, were highly expressed in invasive grade 3 tumors. To further investigate the expression of these genes and the fifth member of the SET complex (pp32), we performed immunohistochemistry, on a tissue array composed of 235 serous tumors of different grades and disease stages. A significant correlation between expression of all SET complex proteins and the tumor differentiation was observed ( p < 0.05). When combining all tumors, overexpression of Nm23 ( p = 0.04), Set ( p = 0.004) and Ape1 ( p = 0.004) was associated with the clinical stage of the disease. No marker by itself was associated with prognosis. The combination of a high level of Nm23 in the context of a low level of Set compared to all other combinations of these markers did confer a better prognosis ( p = 0.03). When combined, high expression of Hmgb2 and low expression of Ape1 was also associated with patient prognosis ( p = 0.05). These findings suggest that a strategy that sums the activities of different partners within a pathway may be more appropriate in designing nomograms for patient stratification. © 2006 Wiley‐Liss, Inc.

This content is not available in your region!

Continue researching here.

Having issues? You can contact us here
Accelerating Research

Address

John Eccles House
Robert Robinson Avenue,
Oxford Science Park, Oxford
OX4 4GP, United Kingdom