Premium
C‐Met overexpression in node‐positive breast cancer identifies patients with poor clinical outcome independent of Her2/neu
Author(s) -
Lengyel Ernst,
Prechtel Dieter,
Resau James H.,
Gauger Katja,
Welk Anita,
Lindemann Kristina,
Salanti Georgia,
Richter Thomas,
Knudsen Beatrice,
Vande Woude George F.,
Harbeck Nadia
Publication year - 2004
Publication title -
international journal of cancer
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 2.475
H-Index - 234
eISSN - 1097-0215
pISSN - 0020-7136
DOI - 10.1002/ijc.20598
Subject(s) - hepatocyte growth factor receptor , c met , breast cancer , hepatocyte growth factor , medicine , immunohistochemistry , her2/neu , lymph node , receptor tyrosine kinase , tyrosine kinase , oncology , cancer research , estrogen receptor , progesterone receptor , metastasis , cancer , pathology , receptor
Receptor tyrosine kinases play an important role in malignant transformation of epithelial cells by activating signal transduction pathways important for proliferation, invasion and metastasis. In a pilot study ( n = 40), we evaluated expression of the c‐Met and Her2/neu receptor tyrosine kinases and the c‐Met ligand hepatocyte growth factor/scatter factor (HGF/SF) in primary breast cancers and their lymph node metastases using both conventional immunohistochemistry and confocal immunofluorescence. Neither c‐Met and HGF/SF nor Her2/neu expression correlated with established prognostic factors such as age, lymph node involvement, estrogen receptor (ER), progesterone receptor (PR), tumor size, or grade. Both staining methods confirmed a significant correlation between c‐Met overexpression and a high risk of disease progression. Furthermore, among tumors with c‐Met overexpression, only 50% also overexpress Her2/neu, thus identifying a subset of patients with aggressive disease in addition to Her2/neu. Median disease‐free survival in patients with c‐Met overexpressing tumors was 8 months compared to 53 months when c‐Met expression was low ( p = 0.037; RR = 3.0). This significant impact of c‐Met on tumor aggressiveness independent of Her2/neu was also confirmed by multivariate analysis. In conclusion, the role of c‐Met expression as a prognostic variable and consequently as an interesting target for novel therapeutic approaches deserves further analysis in a larger cohort of patients.