P16 INK4a as an adjunct marker in liquid‐based cervical cytology

Cytological screening for cervical cancer is hampered by high false negative rates. Inter‐observer reproducibility needs optimizing. The potential of p16 INK4a as a biomarker for cervical lesions was examined in a study of liquid‐based cytology (LBC), HPV DNA testing by MY09/MY11 consensus PCR and type‐specific PCRs and p16 INK4a immunocytochemistry on a series of 291 patients selected from routine screening. Comparison of the number of p16 INK4a immunoreactive cells/1,000 cells exhibited a significantly higher mean count in HSIL (8.80 ± 1.13) than other cytological groups. The mean count of LSIL (1.09 ± 0.18) was significantly higher than that of the negative group (0.82 ± 0.40). ASC‐H and HSIL combined showed a significantly higher mean count (6.46 ± 1.17) than negative, ASC, ASC‐US and LSIL. The mean count of immunoreactive cells/1,000 cells was significantly higher in HPV16 positive samples (3.22 ± 0.72) than in samples containing infections with types of unknown malignant potential (0.83 ± 0.26) or HPV negative samples (1.17 ± 0.41). The mean count in infections with other high‐risk HPV types (2.55 ± 0.52) was significantly higher than that in HPV negative samples. Receiver‐operating characteristic curves yielded a test accuracy (area under curve) of 0.76, 0.79, 0.88 and 0.95 for ASCUS, LSIL, ASC‐H/HSIL and HSIL, respectively. Thresholds for 95% sensitivity were at 0.005, 0.007, 0.098 and 0.445 immunopositive cells/1,000 cells for ASCUS, LSIL, ASC‐H/HSIL and HSIL, respectively. The 95% specificity threshold for the detection of HSIL was at 1.87 immunopositive cells/1,000 cells. P16 INK4a immunocytochemistry can be used as an adjunct to LBC in cervical screening, because it has a good diagnostic accuracy to discriminate HSIL and ASC‐H from other lesions. It could be used as a surrogate marker of high‐risk HPV infections. © 2003 Wiley‐Liss, Inc.