z-logo
Premium
CDH1 mutations are present in both ductal and lobular breast cancer, but promoter allelic variants show no detectable breast cancer risk
Author(s) -
Lei Haixin,
SjöbergMargolin Sara,
Salahshor Sima,
Werelius Barbro,
Jandáková Eva,
Hemminki Kari,
Lindblom Annika,
Vořechovský Igor
Publication year - 2001
Publication title -
international journal of cancer
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 2.475
H-Index - 234
eISSN - 1097-0215
pISSN - 0020-7136
DOI - 10.1002/ijc.10176
Subject(s) - cdh1 , breast cancer , allele , cancer , oncology , biology , medicine , genetics , cancer research , gene , cadherin , cell
Mutations and diminished expression of the E‐cadherin gene (CDH1) have been identified in a number of epithelial malignancies. Although somatic CDH1 mutations were detected in lobular breast cancer with a frequency ranging from 10–56%, CDH1 alterations in more frequent ductal tumors appear to be rare. Here we have analyzed the coding region of CDH1 for mutations using denaturing high performance liquid chromatography and found 4 mutations in 83 ductal carcinomas (5%) and 3 mutations in 25 lobular carcinomas (12%). The germline of 13 patients with familial lobular tumors was also analyzed for mutations, but none were detected. In a case‐control study, we also tested whether a variant adenine allele in the promoter polymorphism −161C→A with a putative influence on the transcriptional activity of CDH1 in vitro confers any detectable risk of breast cancer. No significant difference in the allelic frequency between patients with breast cancer (326/1,152, 28.3%) and controls (190/696, 27.3%, p > 0.05; relative risk 1.05, 95% confidence interval 0.85–1.30) was found. A novel promoter polymorphism was identified at position −152, but the frequency of the variant cytosine allele was also similar in patients with breast cancer and controls (0.71% vs. 0.21%, p = 0.23). Transient transfection experiments using reporter constructs containing the nucleotide substitutions −161C/−152C and −161A/−152T showed only a slight decrease in the transcription activity compared to the wild‐type construct. These results do not support CDH1 as a prominent low‐penetrance cancer susceptibility gene, but indicate that CDH1 mutations contribute to the progression of both lobular and ductal tumors. © 2001 Wiley‐Liss, Inc.

This content is not available in your region!

Continue researching here.

Having issues? You can contact us here