Premium
Applying comprehensive environmental assessment to research planning for multiwalled carbon nanotubes: Refinements to inform future stakeholder engagement
Author(s) -
Powers Christina M,
Grieger Khara,
Meacham Connie A,
Gooding Meredith Lassiter,
Gift Jeffrey S,
Lehmann Geniece M,
Hendren Christine O,
Davis J Michael,
Burgoon Lyle
Publication year - 2016
Publication title -
integrated environmental assessment and management
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.665
H-Index - 57
eISSN - 1551-3793
pISSN - 1551-3777
DOI - 10.1002/ieam.1663
Subject(s) - stakeholder engagement , stakeholder , agency (philosophy) , risk management , risk assessment , scale (ratio) , knowledge management , business , management science , environmental planning , process management , environmental resource management , risk analysis (engineering) , computer science , engineering , political science , public relations , sociology , environmental science , social science , physics , computer security , finance , quantum mechanics
Risk assessments and risk management efforts to protect human health and the environment can benefit from early, coordinated research planning by researchers, risk assessors, and risk managers. However, approaches for engaging these and other stakeholders in research planning have not received much attention in the environmental scientific literature. The Comprehensive Environmental Assessment (CEA) approach under development by the United States Environmental Protection Agency (USEPA) is a means to manage complex information and input from diverse stakeholder perspectives on research planning that will ultimately support environmental and human health decision making. The objectives of this article are to 1) describe the outcomes of applying lessons learned from previous CEA applications to planning research on engineered nanomaterial, multiwalled carbon nanotubes (MWCNTs) and 2) discuss new insights and refinements for future efforts to engage stakeholders in research planning for risk assessment and risk management of environmental issues. Although framed in terms of MWCNTs, this discussion is intended to enhance research planning to support assessments for other environmental issues as well. Key insights for research planning include the potential benefits of 1) ensuring that participants have research, risk assessment, and risk management expertise in addition to diverse disciplinary backgrounds; 2) including an early scoping step before rounds of formal ratings; 3) using a familiar numeric scale (e.g., US dollars) versus ordinal rating scales of “importance”; 4) applying virtual communication tools to supplement face‐to‐face interaction between participants; and 5) refining criteria to guide development of specific, actionable research questions. Integr Environ Assess Manag 2016;12:96–108. © 2015 SETAC