Premium
Interpretation of homogeneity in δ 18 O signatures of stream water in a nested sub‐catchment system in north‐east Scotland
Author(s) -
Dunn S. M.,
Bacon J. R.,
Soulsby C.,
Tetzlaff D.,
Stutter M. I.,
Waldron S.,
Malcolm I. A.
Publication year - 2008
Publication title -
hydrological processes
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 1.222
H-Index - 161
eISSN - 1099-1085
pISSN - 0885-6087
DOI - 10.1002/hyp.7088
Subject(s) - surface runoff , hydrology (agriculture) , groundwater , environmental science , infiltration (hvac) , drainage basin , surface water , streamflow , subsurface flow , streams , catchment hydrology , residence time (fluid dynamics) , storm , geology , geography , ecology , meteorology , geotechnical engineering , cartography , environmental engineering , biology , computer network , oceanography , computer science
The isotope hydrology of a set of nested sub‐catchments in the north‐east of Scotland has been studied to examine the mixing processes and residence times of water in the catchments. The measured δ 18 O in stream waters was found to be exceptionally uniform both temporally and spatially. Hydrochemical mixing analyses showed that groundwater contributes between 62 and 90% of the stream flow in all sub‐catchments. Model analysis indicated that the δ 18 O in stream water is indicative of a highly mixed system in which near surface runoff appears to be mixed with groundwater, within the soil profile, before being released from the catchment. Small fluctuations in the stream water δ 18 O response are generated by a small proportion (<10%) of less‐well mixed water in infiltration excess runoff during storm events. A comparative application of the model to a nearby catchment, which has a lower proportion of groundwater runoff, demonstrated contrasting behaviour, with significantly less mixing of waters occurring and a more distinct difference in the age of runoff generated by different flow paths. This highlighted that standard methods for characterization of mixing mechanisms are often insufficient and may not discriminate between systems that have retained quite distinct flow paths throughout catchment transit, and those which have been mixed at some stage. Model sensitivity analysis also indicated that the simulated mean residence time of water varies most strongly in response to different parameters compared with the δ 18 O response. This has implications for estimating water residence times from isotope data. Copyright © 2008 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.