Premium
Analytical power series solutions to the two‐dimensional advection–dispersion equation with distance‐dependent dispersivities
Author(s) -
Chen JuiSheng,
Ni ChuenFa,
Liang ChingPing
Publication year - 2008
Publication title -
hydrological processes
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 1.222
H-Index - 161
eISSN - 1099-1085
pISSN - 0885-6087
DOI - 10.1002/hyp.7067
Subject(s) - laplace transform , advection , sine and cosine transforms , power series , dispersion (optics) , series (stratigraphy) , power function , mathematical analysis , mathematics , mechanics , fourier transform , physics , fourier analysis , geology , thermodynamics , optics , paleontology , short time fourier transform
As is frequently cited, dispersivity increases with solute travel distance in the subsurface. This behaviour has been attributed to the inherent spatial variation of the pore water velocity in geological porous media. Analytically solving the advection–dispersion equation with distance‐dependent dispersivity is extremely difficult because the governing equation coefficients are dependent upon the distance variable. This study presents an analytical technique to solve a two‐dimensional (2D) advection–dispersion equation with linear distance‐dependent longitudinal and transverse dispersivities for describing solute transport in a uniform flow field. The analytical approach is developed by applying the extended power series method coupled with the Laplace and finite Fourier cosine transforms. The developed solution is then compared to the corresponding numerical solution to assess its accuracy and robustness. The results demonstrate that the breakthrough curves at different spatial locations obtained from the power series solution show good agreement with those obtained from the numerical solution. However, owing to the limited numerical operation for large values of the power series functions, the developed analytical solution can only be numerically evaluated when the values of longitudinal dispersivity/distance ratio e L exceed 0·075. Moreover, breakthrough curves obtained from the distance‐dependent solution are compared with those from the constant dispersivity solution to investigate the relationship between the transport parameters. Our numerical experiments demonstrate that a previously derived relationship is invalid for large e L values. The analytical power series solution derived in this study is efficient and can be a useful tool for future studies in the field of 2D and distance‐dependent dispersive transport. Copyright © 2008 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.