Premium
Chemical and isotopic evidence of nitrogen transformation in the Mississippi River, 1997–98
Author(s) -
Battaglin William A.,
Kendall Carol,
Chang Cecily C. Y.,
Silva Steven R.,
Campbell D. H.
Publication year - 2001
Publication title -
hydrological processes
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 1.222
H-Index - 161
eISSN - 1099-1085
pISSN - 0885-6087
DOI - 10.1002/hyp.214
Subject(s) - tributary , hydrology (agriculture) , drainage basin , environmental science , discharge , current (fluid) , nutrient , nitrate , drainage , geology , oceanography , ecology , geography , cartography , geotechnical engineering , biology
An Erratum has been published for this article in Hydrological Processes 16(5) 2002, 1129–1130. Nitrate (NO 3 ) and other nutrients discharged by the Mississippi River are suspected of causing a zone of depleted dissolved oxygen (hypoxic zone) in the Gulf of Mexico each summer. The hypoxic zone may have an adverse affect on aquatic life and commercial fisheries. The amount of NO 3 delivered by the Mississippi River to the Gulf of Mexico is well documented, but the relative contributions of different sources of NO 3 , and the magnitude of subsequent in‐stream transformations of NO 3 , are not well understood. Forty‐two water samples collected in 1997 and 1998 at eight stations located either on the Mississippi River or its major tributaries were analysed for NO 3 , total nitrogen (N), atrazine, chloride concentrations and NO 3 stable isotopes (δ 15 N and δ 18 O). These data are used to assess the magnitude and nature of in‐stream N transformation and to determine if the δ 15 N and δ 18 O of NO 3 provide information about NO 3 sources and transformation processes in a large river system (drainage area 2 900 000 km 2 ) that would otherwise be unavailable using concentration and discharge data alone. Results from 42 samples indicate that the δ 15 N and δ 18 O ratios between sites on the Mississippi River and its tributaries are somewhat distinctive, and vary with season and discharge rate. Of particular interest are two nearly Lagrangian sample sets, in which samples from the Mississippi River at St Francisville, LA, are compared with samples collected from the Ohio River at Grand Chain, II, and the Mississippi River at Thebes, IL. In both Lagrangian sets, mass‐balance calculations indicate only a small amount of in‐stream N loss. The stable isotope data from the samples suggest that in‐stream N assimilation and not denitrification accounts for most of the N loss in the lower Mississippi River during the spring and early summer months. Published in 2001 by John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.