Premium
Regulation of peatland evaporation following wildfire; the complex control of soil tension under dynamic evaporation demand
Author(s) -
Kettridge Nicholas,
Lukenbach Maxwell C.,
Hokanson Kelly J.,
Devito Kevin J.,
Petrone Richard M.,
Mendoza Carl A.,
Waddington James Michael
Publication year - 2021
Publication title -
hydrological processes
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 1.222
H-Index - 161
eISSN - 1099-1085
pISSN - 0885-6087
DOI - 10.1002/hyp.14132
Subject(s) - peat , environmental science , atmospheric sciences , evapotranspiration , evaporation , canopy , hydrology (agriculture) , transpiration , potential evaporation , soil water , boreal , growing season , soil science , ecology , meteorology , geology , geography , photosynthesis , botany , geotechnical engineering , biology
The capability of peatland ecosystems to regulate evapotranspiration (ET) following wildfire is a key control on the resilience of their globally important carbon stocks under future climatic conditions. Evaporation dominates post‐fire ET, with canopy and sub‐canopy removal restricting transpiration and increasing evaporation potential. Therefore, in order to project the hydrology and associated stability of peatlands to a diverse range of post‐fire weather conditions and future climates the regulation of evaporation must be accurately parameterised in peatland ecohydrological models. To achieve this, we measure the surface resistance ( r s ) to evaporation over the growing season one year post‐fire within four zones of a boreal peatland that burned to differing depths, relating r s to near surface soil tensions. We show that the magnitude and temporal variability in r s varies with burn severity. At the peatland scale, r s and near‐surface tension correlates non‐linearly. However, at the point scale no relationship was evident between temporal variations in r s and near‐surface tension across all burn severities; in part due to the limited fluctuation in near‐surface tensions and the precision of r s measurements. Where automated measurements enabled averaging of errors, the relationship between near‐surface tension and r s switched between periods of strong and weak correlation within a burned peat hummock. This relationship, when strong, deviated from that obtained under steady state laboratory conditions; increases in r s were more sensitive to fluctuations in near‐surface tension under dynamic field conditions. Calculating soil vapour densities directly from near‐surface tensions is shown to require calibration between peat types and provides little if any benefit beyond the derivation of empirical relationships between r s and measured soil tension. Thus, we demonstrate important spatiotemporal fluctuations in post‐fire r s that will be key to regulating post‐fire peatland hydrology, but highlight the complex challenges in effectively parameterising this important underlying control of near‐surface tensions within hydrological simulations.