z-logo
Premium
Do southern Appalachian Mountain summer stream temperatures respond to removal of understory rhododendron thickets?
Author(s) -
Raulerson Scott,
Jackson C. Rhett,
Melear Nathan D.,
Younger Seth E.,
Dudley Maura,
Elliott Katherine J.
Publication year - 2020
Publication title -
hydrological processes
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 1.222
H-Index - 161
eISSN - 1099-1085
pISSN - 0885-6087
DOI - 10.1002/hyp.13788
Subject(s) - understory , streams , environmental science , riparian zone , canopy , thicket , evergreen , hydrology (agriculture) , prescribed burn , microclimate , deciduous , shrub , ecology , biology , geology , habitat , computer network , geotechnical engineering , computer science
Abstract Dense understory thickets of the native evergreen shrub Rhododendron maximum expanded initially following elimination of American chestnut by the chestnut blight, and later in response to loss of the eastern hemlock due to hemlock woolly adelgid invasion. Rhododendron thickets often blanket streams and their riparian zones, creating cool, low‐light microclimates. To determine the effect of such understory thickets on summer stream temperatures, we removed riparian rhododendron understory on 300 m reaches of two southern Appalachian Mountain headwater streams, while leaving two 300 m reference reaches undisturbed. Overhead canopy was left intact in all four streams, but all streams were selected to have a significant component of dead or dying eastern hemlock in the overstory, creating time‐varying canopy gaps throughout the reach. We continuously monitored temperatures upstream, within and downstream of treatment and reference reaches. Temperatures were monitored in all four streams in the summer before treatments were imposed (2014), and for two summers following treatment (2015, 2016). Temperatures varied significantly across and within streams prior to treatment and across years for the reference streams. After rhododendron removal, increases in summer stream temperatures were observed at some locations within the treatment reaches, but these increases did not persist downstream and varied by watershed, sensor, and year. Significant increases in daily maxima in treatment reaches ranged from 0.9 to 2.6°C. Overhead canopy provided enough shade to prevent rhododendron removal from increasing summer temperatures to levels deleterious to native cold‐water fauna (average summer temperatures remained below 16°C), and local temperature effects were not persistent.

This content is not available in your region!

Continue researching here.

Having issues? You can contact us here