Premium
Spatio‐temporal variability of the isotopic input signal in a partly forested catchment: Implications for hydrograph separation
Author(s) -
Cayuela Carles,
Latron Jérôme,
Geris Josie,
Llorens Pilar
Publication year - 2018
Publication title -
hydrological processes
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 1.222
H-Index - 161
eISSN - 1099-1085
pISSN - 0885-6087
DOI - 10.1002/hyp.13309
Subject(s) - hydrograph , environmental science , drainage basin , precipitation , spatial variability , tracer , hydrology (agriculture) , throughfall , sampling (signal processing) , streams , catchment hydrology , mediterranean climate , stable isotope ratio , temporal scales , soil science , geology , soil water , ecology , geography , meteorology , mathematics , filter (signal processing) , computer network , computer science , biology , quantum mechanics , nuclear physics , computer vision , statistics , physics , cartography , geotechnical engineering
The isotopic composition of precipitation (D and 18 O) has been widely used as an input signal in water tracer studies. Whereas much recent effort has been put into developing methodologies to improve our understanding and modelling of hydrological processes (e.g., transit‐time distributions or young water fractions), less attention has been paid to the spatio‐temporal variability of the isotopic composition of precipitation, used as input signal in these studies. Here, we investigated the uncertainty in isotope‐based hydrograph separation due to the spatio‐temporal variability of the isotopic composition of precipitation. The study was carried out in a Mediterranean headwater catchment (0.56 km 2 ). Rainfall and throughfall samples were collected at three locations across this relatively small catchment, and stream water samples were collected at the outlet. Results showed that throughout an event, the spatial variability of the input signal had a higher impact on hydrograph separation results than its temporal variability. However, differences in isotope‐based hydrograph separation determined preevent water due to the spatio‐temporal variability were different between events and ranged between 1 and 14%. Based on catchment‐scale isoscapes, the most representative sampling location could also be identified. This study confirms that even in small headwater catchments, spatio‐temporal variability can be significant. Therefore, it is important to characterize this variability and identify the best sampling strategy to reduce the uncertainty in our understanding of catchment hydrological processes.