Premium
Synthesis of soil‐hydraulic properties and infiltration timescales in wildfire‐affected soils
Author(s) -
Ebel Brian A.,
Moody John A.
Publication year - 2016
Publication title -
hydrological processes
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 1.222
H-Index - 161
eISSN - 1099-1085
pISSN - 0885-6087
DOI - 10.1002/hyp.10998
Subject(s) - sorptivity , infiltration (hvac) , soil water , ponding , surface runoff , hydraulic conductivity , environmental science , soil science , hydrology (agriculture) , geology , geotechnical engineering , porosity , materials science , drainage , ecology , composite material , biology
We collected soil‐hydraulic property data from the literature for wildfire‐affected soils, ash, and unburned soils. These data were used to calculate metrics and timescales of hydrologic response related to infiltration and surface runoff generation. Sorptivity ( S ) and wetting front potential (Ψ f ) were significantly different (lower) in burned soils compared with unburned soils, whereas field‐saturated hydraulic conductivity ( K fs ) was not significantly different. The magnitude and duration of the influence of capillarity during infiltration was greatly reduced in burned soils, causing faster ponding times in response to rainfall. Ash had large values of S and K fs but moderate values of Ψ f , compared with unburned and burned soils, indicating ash has long ponding times in response to rainfall. The ratio of S 2 /K fs was nearly constant (~100 mm) for unburned soils but more variable in burned soils, suggesting that unburned soils have a balance between gravity and capillarity contributions to infiltration that may depend on soil organic matter, whereas in burned soils the gravity contribution to infiltration is greater. Changes in S and K fs in burned soils act synergistically to reduce infiltration and accelerate and amplify surface runoff generation. Synthesis of these findings identifies three key areas for future research. First, short timescales of capillary influences on infiltration indicate the need for better measurements of infiltration at times less than 1 min to accurately characterize S in burned soils. Second, using parameter values, such as Ψ f , from unburned areas could produce substantial errors in hydrologic modeling when used without adjustment for wildfire effects, causing parameter compensation and resulting underestimation of K fs . Third, more thorough measurement campaigns that capture soil‐structural changes, organic matter impacts, quantitative water repellency trends, and soil‐water content along with soil‐hydraulic properties could drive the development of better techniques for numerically simulating infiltration in burned areas.