z-logo
Premium
Modelling sediment and total phosphorus export from a lowland catchment: comparing sediment routing methods
Author(s) -
Lu Shenglan,
Kronvang Brian,
Audet Joachim,
Trolle Dennis,
Andersen Hans Estrup,
Thodsen Hans,
Griensven Ann
Publication year - 2014
Publication title -
hydrological processes
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 1.222
H-Index - 161
eISSN - 1099-1085
pISSN - 0885-6087
DOI - 10.1002/hyp.10149
Subject(s) - swat model , sediment , environmental science , erosion , hydrology (agriculture) , drainage basin , routing (electronic design automation) , soil and water assessment tool , bank erosion , flow routing , surface runoff , streamflow , geology , geotechnical engineering , geomorphology , ecology , computer science , computer network , cartography , geography , biology
Bank erosion is the main source of suspended sediment (SS) and diffuse total phosphorus (TP) in many lowland catchments. This study compared a physically based sediment routing method (Physical method), which distinguishes between stream bed and bank erosion, with the original sediment routing method (Original method) within the Soil and Water Assessment Tool (SWAT) version 2009, for simulating SS and TP losses from a lowland catchment. A SWAT model was set up for the lowland River Odense catchment in Denmark and calibrated against observed stream flow and phosphate (PO 4 ) loads. On the basis of an initial calibration of hydrological and PO 4 parameters, the SWAT model with the Original method (Original model) and the SWAT model with the Physical method (Physical model) were calibrated separately against observed SS and TP loads. The SWAT model simulated daily stream flow well but underestimated PO 4 loads. The Physical model simulated daily SS and TP better than the Original model. The simulated contribution of bank erosion to SS in the Physical model (99%) was close to the estimated contribution from in situ erosion measurements (90–94%). Compared with the Original method, the Physical method is not only more conceptually correct but also improves model performance. Copyright © 2014 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

This content is not available in your region!

Continue researching here.

Having issues? You can contact us here