Premium
Process‐based modelling of a headwater catchment in a semi‐arid area: the influence of macropore flow
Author(s) -
Schaik N. L. M. B.,
Bronstert A.,
Jong S. M.,
Jetten V. G.,
Dam J. C.,
Ritsema C. J.,
Schnabel S.
Publication year - 2013
Publication title -
hydrological processes
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 1.222
H-Index - 161
eISSN - 1099-1085
pISSN - 0885-6087
DOI - 10.1002/hyp.10086
Subject(s) - macropore , surface runoff , hydrology (agriculture) , sorptivity , environmental science , arid , flow (mathematics) , subsurface flow , drainage basin , catchment hydrology , soil science , geology , mathematics , ecology , porosity , geography , geotechnical engineering , groundwater , chemistry , mesoporous material , paleontology , biochemistry , geometry , cartography , biology , catalysis
Subsurface stormflow is thought to occur mainly in humid environments with steep terrains. However, in semi‐arid areas, preferential flow through macropores can also result in a significant contribution of subsurface stormflow to catchment runoff for varying catchment conditions. Most hydrological models neglect this important subsurface preferential flow. Here, we use the process‐oriented hydrological model Hillflow‐3D, which includes a macropore flow approach, to simulate rainfall‐runoff in the semi‐arid Parapuños catchment in Spain, where macropore flow was observed in previous research. The model was extended for this study to account for sorptivity under very dry soil conditions. The results of the model simulations with and without macropore flow are compared. Both model versions give reasonable results for average rainfall situations, although the approach with the macropore concept provides slightly better results. The model results for scenarios of extreme rainfall events (>13.3 mm 30 min −1 ) however show large differences between the versions with and without macropores. These model results compared with measured rainfall‐runoff data show that the model with the macropore concept is better. Our conclusion is that preferential flow is important in controlling surface runoff in case of specific, high intensity rainfall events. Therefore, preferential flow processes must be included in hydrological models where we know that preferential flow occurs. Hydrological process models with a less detailed process description may fit observed average events reasonably well but can result in erroneous predictions for more extreme events. Copyright © 2013 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.