Premium
Performance effects of drugs of abuse: A methodological survey
Author(s) -
Foltin Richard W.,
Evans Suzette M.
Publication year - 1993
Publication title -
human psychopharmacology: clinical and experimental
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.461
H-Index - 78
eISSN - 1099-1077
pISSN - 0885-6222
DOI - 10.1002/hup.470080104
Subject(s) - comparability , protocol (science) , task (project management) , drug , drug administration , medicine , test (biology) , drugs of abuse , standardization , psychology , computer science , pharmacology , alternative medicine , mathematics , paleontology , management , pathology , combinatorics , economics , biology , operating system
This paper provides a methodological survey of research of 1253 experiments on the acute effects of drugs used for non‐medical purposes on human performance. 305 different tasks were tested, but only 118 tasks were used in more than two experiments. While the majority of experiments did have control conditions and measured drug effects at more than one time point after drug administration, they varied widely on other protocol details: (1) subject populations, (2) training on the tasks prior to drug administration, and (3) number of active test doses that were tested. Administration of stimulants either had no effect, or improved performance. In contrast, administration of marijuana, alcohol, or benzodiazepines had no effect, or impaired performance. In order to maximize comparability and utility, future protocols should use control groups, train subjects prior to participation, test more than one drug dose, and test performance before, and several times after, drug administration. A greater range of subject populations should also be studied. Finally, task standardization including type of instructions to subjects, duration of performance testing, feedback to subjects, motivational conditions, and inclusion of a benchmark task should also be used to enhance comparisons across studies.