Premium
Phenylketonuria: Genotype–phenotype correlations based on expression analysis of structural and functional mutations in PAH
Author(s) -
Pey Angel L.,
Desviat Lourdes R.,
Gámez Alejandra,
Ugarte Magdalena,
Pérez Belén
Publication year - 2003
Publication title -
human mutation
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 1.981
H-Index - 162
eISSN - 1098-1004
pISSN - 1059-7794
DOI - 10.1002/humu.10198
Subject(s) - biology , mutation , point mutation , phenotype , context (archaeology) , mutant , genetics , genotype , protein folding , gene , biochemistry , paleontology
Abstract When analyzed in the context of the phenylalanine hydroxylase (PAH) three‐dimensional structure, only a minority of the PKU mutations described world‐wide affect catalytic residues. Consistent with these observations, recent data point to defective folding and subsequent aggregation/degradation as a predominant disease mechanism for several mutations. In this work, we use a combined approach of expression in eukaryotic cells at different temperatures and a prokaryotic system with co‐expression of chaperonins to elucidate and confirm structural consequences for 18 PKU mutations. Three mutations are located in the amino terminal regulatory domain and 15 in the catalytic domain. Four mutations were found to abolish the specific activity in all conditions. Two are catalytic mutations (Y277D and E280K) and two are severe structural defects (IVS10–11G>A and L311P). All the remaining mutations (D59Y, I65T, E76G, P122Q, R158Q, G218V, R243Q, P244L, R252W, R261Q, A309V, R408Q, R408W, and Y414C) are folding defects causing reduced stability and accelerated degradation, although some of them probably affect residues involved in regulation. In these cases, we have demonstrated that the amount of mutant PAH protein and residual activity could be modulated by in vitro experimental conditions, and therefore the observed in vivo metabolic variation may be explained by interindividual variation in the quality control systems. The results derived provide an experimental framework to define the mutation severity relating genotype to phenotype. They also explain the observed inconsistencies for some mutations in patients with similar genotype and different phenotypes. Hum Mutat 21:370–378, 2003. © 2003 Wiley‐Liss, Inc.