z-logo
Premium
Attitudes of first‐line supervisors toward subordinate appraisals
Author(s) -
Bernardin H. John,
Dahmus Sue A.,
Redmon Gregory
Publication year - 1993
Publication title -
human resource management
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 1.888
H-Index - 94
eISSN - 1099-050X
pISSN - 0090-4848
DOI - 10.1002/hrm.3930320209
Subject(s) - psychology , performance appraisal , agency (philosophy) , social psychology , applied psychology , public relations , management , political science , sociology , social science , economics
Three groups of supervisors who worked for a federal agency completed a questionnaire regarding attitudes toward subordinate appraisal and other aspects of performance appraisal. Group 1 received appraisal feedback from both their managers and their subordinates. Group 2 received feedback from their managers only. Group 3 received feedback about their performance from their subordinates only. Regardless of group assignment, supervisors were generally supportive of subordinate appraisal. Group 1 responded more positively to subordinate appraisal and the appraisal process in general. Group 3 expressed more concern that subordinate appraisals would undermine supervisors' authority and that supervisors would focus on pleasing subordinates. © 1993 by John Wiley & Sons, Inc.

This content is not available in your region!

Continue researching here.

Having issues? You can contact us here
Accelerating Research

Address

John Eccles House
Robert Robinson Avenue,
Oxford Science Park, Oxford
OX4 4GP, United Kingdom