z-logo
Premium
What, when, and who: Manager involvement in predicting employee resistance to acquisition integration
Author(s) -
King David R.,
Bauer Florian,
Derek Weng Qingxiong,
Schriber Svante,
Tarba Shlomo
Publication year - 2019
Publication title -
human resource management
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 1.888
H-Index - 94
eISSN - 1099-050X
pISSN - 0090-4848
DOI - 10.1002/hrm.21973
Subject(s) - sensemaking , resistance (ecology) , task (project management) , process (computing) , knowledge management , perspective (graphical) , business , process management , psychology , computer science , management , economics , artificial intelligence , ecology , biology , operating system
Applying sensemaking research to acquisition integration, we outline factors that influence employee resistance to acquisitions. While integration is widely viewed as important to acquisition outcomes, there is limited systematic study of how employees react to the integration process. Using survey data from Chinese acquirers and applying partial least squares structural equation modeling, we examine what changes with human and task integration with the speed of when changes are made to explore relationships with employee resistance. Consistent with a temporal perspective of acquisition processes and sensemaking we find slower task integration may mitigate employee resistance to acquisition integration. However, employee resistance to the speed that changes are made likely varies for who is involved, suggesting different roles for top and middle managers. Specifically, middle management involvement with slow human integration and top management involvement with fast task integration reduces employee resistance following an acquisition.

This content is not available in your region!

Continue researching here.

Having issues? You can contact us here