Premium
Mind the Intended‐Implemented Gap: Understanding Employees’ Perceptions of HRM
Author(s) -
Piening Erk P.,
Baluch Alina M.,
Ridder HansGerd
Publication year - 2014
Publication title -
human resource management
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 1.888
H-Index - 94
eISSN - 1099-050X
pISSN - 0090-4848
DOI - 10.1002/hrm.21605
Subject(s) - leverage (statistics) , human resource management , knowledge management , perception , german , set (abstract data type) , human resources , business , line management , psychology , public relations , management , computer science , political science , archaeology , neuroscience , machine learning , economics , history , programming language
This study aims to shed light on the implementation of HR practices as a key piece of the human resource management ( HRM )–performance puzzle. Although the literature suggests that discrepancies between the organization's intended and implemented HR practices are essential to understanding employees’ perceptions of and reactions to HRM , little attention has been devoted to this issue. Drawing upon a multiple‐case study of German health and social services organizations, we therefore explore the linkages (and potential gaps) between intended, implemented, and perceived HR practices. Our study provides new insights into the underlying mechanisms of this relationship, highlighting an organization's ability to leverage its resources as playing a crucial moderating role in implementing intended HR practices, while employees’ expectations of HRM moderate the link between implemented and perceived HR practices. We advance a set of propositions that contributes to a more nuanced, multilevel understanding of the complex phenomenon of HRM implementation. © 2014 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.