Premium
The differential effects of job design on knowledge workers and manual workers: A quasi‐experimental field study in China
Author(s) -
Yan Ming,
Peng Kelly Z.,
Francesco Anne Marie
Publication year - 2011
Publication title -
human resource management
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 1.888
H-Index - 94
eISSN - 1099-050X
pISSN - 0090-4848
DOI - 10.1002/hrm.20428
Subject(s) - moderation , job satisfaction , job design , job enrichment , task (project management) , job performance , china , psychology , job attitude , job analysis , personnel psychology , knowledge management , applied psychology , computer science , social psychology , management , political science , economics , law
When Taylorism was discarded long ago, job enrichment emerged as a good alternative. Recent research, however, has pointed out the ineffectiveness of job enrichment. This study suggests that both approaches could be effective and looks at job nature as the moderator that can affect how the two approaches are applied. The authors' longitudinal quasi‐experimental field study in China found a significant interaction between worker type (knowledge workers [KWs] versus manual workers [MWs]) and job characteristics on employee outcomes. After enrichment, KWs experienced higher satisfaction and task performance, whereas for MWs, satisfaction and performance declined. This pattern of results suggests that both job enrichment and Taylorism are applicable depending on the job nature. In addition to contributing to job design theory, the present study also explored the unique attributes of KWs and provides practical suggestions as to how human resource managers can better motivate KWs. © 2011 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.