Premium
Decentralization, health care and policy process in the Punjab, Pakistan in the 1990s
Author(s) -
Collins C. D.,
Omar Mayeh,
Tarin Ehsanullah
Publication year - 2002
Publication title -
the international journal of health planning and management
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.672
H-Index - 41
eISSN - 1099-1751
pISSN - 0749-6753
DOI - 10.1002/hpm.657
Subject(s) - decentralization , government (linguistics) , promotion (chess) , politics , health policy , health care , public administration , economic growth , business , health promotion , process (computing) , political science , economics , philosophy , linguistics , computer science , law , operating system
Abstract The Province of the Punjab underwent a number of attempts to decentralize the health sector in the 1990s. Among the most important were the decentralization of financial management within the district, the Sheikhupura PHC Pilot Project, the establishment of the District Health Authorities and District Health Management Teams, the creation of semi‐autonomous hospitals and the programme of District Health Government (DHG). These usually received donor support and promotion, and emerged from within the provincial Department of Health, and more specifically the Secretariat and the internationally supported Second Family Health Project (FH2). Of particular significance was the DHG change, which involved a decentralization to the district, the appointment of powerful Chief Executives, the formation of District Management Committees and purchaser–provider separation. The paper reviews these proposals, focusing on the need to build on experiences and learning lessons from pilot projects, reform continuity, developing consultation and involvement and policy analysis. The latter indicates the importance of developing more in‐depth policy analysis around the role of the central organization, the form of decentralization and the purchaser–provider separation. The paper concludes by underlining the need to ensure that political strategy and in‐depth policy are appropriately coordinated in the policy process. Copyright © 2002 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.