Premium
Japanese hospitals—culture and competition: A study of ten hospitals
Author(s) -
Anbäcken Owe
Publication year - 1994
Publication title -
the international journal of health planning and management
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.672
H-Index - 41
eISSN - 1099-1751
pISSN - 0749-6753
DOI - 10.1002/hpm.4740090107
Subject(s) - staffing , health care , government (linguistics) , nursing , competition (biology) , christian ministry , welfare , business , organizational culture , family medicine , medicine , public relations , political science , ecology , linguistics , philosophy , law , biology
Japanese health care is characterized by a pluralistic system with a high degree of private producers. Central government regulates the prices and the financing system. All citizens are covered by a mandatory employment‐based health insurance operating on a nonprofit basis. The consumer has a free choice of physician and hospital. A comparison between Japan, Sweden and some other countries shows significant dissimilarities in the length of stay, number of treatments per hospital bed and year and the staffing of hospitals. About 80 per cent of the hospitals and 94 per cent of the clinics are privately owned. The typical private hospital owned by a physician has less than 100 beds In this paper, data collected (1992/93) in an empirical study of Japanese hospitals and their leadership is presented. Also discussed are the hospitals' style of management, tools and strategies for competition and competences—personal and formal skills required of the leadership in the hospital There follows a study of ten hospitals, among which hospital directors and chief physicians were interviewed. Interviews are also made with key persons in the Ministry of Health and Welfare and other organizations in the health care field. The result is also analysed from a cultural perspective—‘what kind of impact does the Japanese culture have on the health care organization?’ and/or ‘what kind of sub‐culture is developed in the Japanese hospitals’. Some comparisons are made with Sweden, USA, Canada and Germany. The different roles of the professions in the hospital are included in the study as well as the incentives for different kinds of strategies — specialization, growing in size, investments in new equipment, different kind of ownership and hospitals. Another issue discussed is the attempt to uncover whether there is an implicit distribution of specialities—silent agreements between hospitals, etc.