Premium
Evaluating performance of local case‐mix system by international comparison: a case study in Beijing, China
Author(s) -
Jian WeiYan,
Lu Ming,
Cui Tao,
Hu Mu
Publication year - 2011
Publication title -
the international journal of health planning and management
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.672
H-Index - 41
eISSN - 1099-1751
pISSN - 0749-6753
DOI - 10.1002/hpm.1111
Subject(s) - beijing , case mix index , china , medicine , operations management , business , geography , economics , nursing , archaeology
SUMMARY Background Case‐mix is an important tool for health planning and management in many countries. As a major developing country, China is considering the introduction of the case‐mix system in the health reform. Beijing, the capital of China, developed a local case‐mix version whose performance needs to be evaluated before utilization. Objective The objective of this study was to evaluate the performance of the case‐mix system developed in Beijing by comparing it with those used in Australia and the USA. Method A total of 1.3 million inpatient records from 154 hospitals in Beijing in 2008 were grouped respectively using three case‐mix systems: (i) Beijing Diagnosis Related Groups (BJ‐DRGs); (ii) US‐based All Patient DRGs; and (iii) Australian Refined DRGs. Coefficient of variation (CV) and reduction in variance (RIV) were used to measure the performance of DRGs system. Results The BJ‐DRGs produced the best CV and RIV results for expenditure. However, at the level of Major Diagnostic Category (MDC), three MDCs of BJ‐DRGs gave the poorest RIVs for both expenditure and length of stay. Conclusions Although the performance of BJ‐DRGs was acceptable, further revision and improvement is needed. Comparisons with other mature DRGs versions can assist in identifying the improvement priorities of the local version. Copyright © 2011 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.