Premium
Pooled analysis of the reports of pomalidomide after failure of lenalidomide and (or) bortezomib for multiple myeloma
Author(s) -
Sheng Zhixin,
Liu Guangyu
Publication year - 2016
Publication title -
hematological oncology
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.918
H-Index - 44
eISSN - 1099-1069
pISSN - 0278-0232
DOI - 10.1002/hon.2192
Subject(s) - pomalidomide , lenalidomide , bortezomib , multiple myeloma , medicine , oncology , neutropenia , thalidomide , regimen , dexamethasone , surgery , toxicity
The use of pomalidomide after lenalidomide and (or) bortezomib failure in patients with multiple myeloma is not clearly clarified in clinical practice. We sought to compile the available clinical reports to better understand the effectiveness of pomalidomide after failure of lenalidomide and (or) bortezomib. We searched published reports including pomalidomide, lenalidomide and (or) bortezomib. Seven reports were identified. Pomalidomide‐based regimen was pomalidomide plus low‐dose dexamethasone (POM + LoDEX). Six randomized controlled trials enrolling a total of 641 patients that evaluated the treatment effects of pomalidomide after lenalidomide and (or) bortezomib failure in patients with multiple myeloma were included. Pooled results showed that the overall response rate (ORR) was 31% in the POM + LoDEX group. Analysis of heterogeneity showed very little ( p = 0.997, I 2 = 0%), suggesting that response rates of POM + LoDEX therapy were consistent across those included trials. Stable disease was achieved in 40% of 603 patients (heterogeneity: p = 0.980, I 2 = 0%). In those >65 years, overall response was achieved in 32% of 71 patients (heterogeneity: p = 0.77, I 2 = 0%). POM + LoDEX showed promising activity in the 95 patients with high‐risk cytogenetic abnormalities: ORR was 27% (heterogeneity: p = 0.97, I 2 = 0%). In the pooled analysis, toxicity consisted primarily of myelosuppression: Grade 3 or 4 neutropenia was seen in 53% (heterogeneity: p = 0.857, I 2 = 0%). Pomalidomide may produce clinical benefits in patients who had shown refractory on prior lenalidomide and (or) bortezomib therapy. Moreover, elder patients and high‐risk cytogenetic abnormalities were not negative predictors for pomalidomide response after lenalidomide and (or) bortezomib failure. Copyright © 2015 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.