z-logo
Premium
Natural immunoglobulin M initiates an inflammatory response important for both hepatic ischemia reperfusion injury and regeneration in mice
Author(s) -
Marshall Keely,
Jin Junfei,
Atkinson Carl,
Alawieh Ali,
Qiao Fei,
Lei Biao,
Chavin Kenneth D.,
He Songqing,
Tomlinson Stephen
Publication year - 2018
Publication title -
hepatology
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 5.488
H-Index - 361
eISSN - 1527-3350
pISSN - 0270-9139
DOI - 10.1002/hep.29512
Subject(s) - antibody , complement system , immunology , biology , complement c1q , reperfusion injury , liver regeneration , recombination activating gene , immunoglobulin m , monoclonal antibody , inflammation , regeneration (biology) , immunoglobulin g , microbiology and biotechnology , ischemia , medicine , biochemistry , gene , recombination
Complement plays a role in both hepatic ischemia reperfusion (IR) injury (IRI) and liver regeneration, but it is not clear how complement is activated in either process. We investigated the role of self‐reactive immunoglobulin M (IgM) antibodies in activating complement after hepatic IR and liver resection. Natural IgM antibodies that recognize danger‐associated molecular patterns (neoepitopes) activate complement following both hepatic IR and liver resection. Antibody‐deficient Rag1 –/– mice were protected from hepatic IRI, but had increased hepatic injury and an impaired regenerative response after 70% partial hepatectomy (PHx). We identified two IgM monoclonal antibodies (mAbs) that specifically reversed the effect of Rag1 deficiency in both models; B4 (recognizes Annexin IV) and C2 (recognizes subset of phospholipids). Focusing on the B4‐specific response, we demonstrated sinusoidal colocalization of IgM and C3d in Rag1 –/– mice that were reconstituted with B4 mAb, and furthermore that the Annexin IV neoepitope is specifically and similarly expressed after both hepatic IR and PHx in wild‐type (WT) mice. A single‐chain antibody construct (scFv) derived from B4 mAb blocked IgM binding and reduced injury post‐IR in WT mice, although, interestingly, B4scFv did not alter regeneration post‐PHx, indicating that anti‐Annexin IV antibodies are sufficient, but not necessary, for the regenerative response in the context of an entire natural antibody repertoire. We also demonstrated expression of the B4 neoepitope in postischemic human liver samples obtained posttransplantation and a corollary depletion in IgM recognizing the B4 and C2 neoepitopes in patient sera following liver transplantation. Conclusion: These data indicate an important role for IgM in hepatic IRI and regeneration, with a similar cross‐species injury‐specific recognition system that has implications for the design of neoepitope targeted therapeutics. (H epatology 2018;67:721‐735).

This content is not available in your region!

Continue researching here.

Having issues? You can contact us here