Premium
The role of hepatic resection in the treatment of hepatocellular cancer
Author(s) -
Roayaie Sasan,
Jibara Ghalib,
Tabrizian Parissa,
Park JoongWon,
Yang Jijin,
Yan Lunan,
Schwartz Myron,
Han Guohong,
Izzo Francesco,
Chen Mishan,
Blanc JeanFrédéric,
Johnson Philip,
Kudo Masatoshi,
Roberts Lewis R.,
Sherman Morris
Publication year - 2015
Publication title -
hepatology
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 5.488
H-Index - 361
eISSN - 1527-3350
pISSN - 0270-9139
DOI - 10.1002/hep.27745
Subject(s) - medicine , resection , liver transplantation , cirrhosis , hepatocellular carcinoma , proportional hazards model , portal hypertension , hepatectomy , surgery , cohort , gastroenterology , transplantation
Current guidelines recommend surgical resection as the primary treatment for a single hepatocellular cancer (HCC) with Child's A cirrhosis, normal serum bilirubin, and no clinically significant portal hypertension. We determined how frequently guidelines were followed and whether straying from them impacted survival. BRIDGE is a multiregional cohort study including HCC patients diagnosed between January 1, 2005 and June 30, 2011. A total of 8,656 patients from 20 sites were classified into four groups: (A) 718 ideal resection candidates who were resected; (B) 144 ideal resection candidates who were not resected; (C) 1,624 nonideal resection candidates who were resected; and (D) 6,170 nonideal resection candidates who were not resected. Median follow‐up was 27 months. Log‐rank and Cox's regression analyses were conducted to determine differences between groups and variables associated with survival. Multivariate analysis of all ideal candidates for resection (A+B) revealed a higher risk of mortality with treatments other than resection. For all resected patients (A+C), portal hypertension and bilirubin >1 mg/dL were not associated with mortality. For all patients who were not ideal candidates for resection (C+D), resection was associated with better survival, compared to embolization and “other” treatments, but was inferior to ablation and transplantation. Conclusions : The majority of patients undergoing resection would not be considered ideal candidates based on current guidelines. Not resecting ideal candidates was associated with higher mortality. The study suggests that selection criteria for resection may be modestly expanded without compromising outcomes, and that some nonideal candidates may still potentially benefit from resection over other treatment modalities. (H epatology 2015;62:440–451