z-logo
Premium
Hepatocellular carcinoma screening in patients with compensated hepatitis C virus (HCV)‐related cirrhosis aware of their HCV status improves survival: A modeling approach
Author(s) -
Mourad Abbas,
DeufficBurban Sylvie,
GanneCarrié Nathalie,
RenautVantroys Thibaud,
Rosa Isabelle,
Bouvier AnneMarie,
Launoy Guy,
Cattan Stephane,
Louvet Alexandre,
Dharancy Sébastien,
Trinchet JeanClaude,
Yazdanpanah Yazdan,
Mathurin Philippe
Publication year - 2014
Publication title -
hepatology
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 5.488
H-Index - 361
eISSN - 1527-3350
pISSN - 0270-9139
DOI - 10.1002/hep.26944
Subject(s) - hepatocellular carcinoma , medicine , cirrhosis , hepatitis c virus , hepatitis c , liver cancer , gastroenterology , mortality rate , liver disease , stage (stratigraphy) , randomized controlled trial , oncology , immunology , virus , paleontology , biology
Because of the ongoing debate on the benefit of ultrasound (US) screening for hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC), we assessed the impact of screening on hepatitis C virus (HCV)‐related compensated cirrhosis patients aware of their HCV status. A Markov model simulated progression from HCC diagnosis to death in 700 patients with HCV‐related compensated cirrhosis aware of their HCV status to estimate life expectancy (LE) and cumulative death at 5 years. Five scenarios were compared: S1, no screening; S2, screening by currently existing practices (57% access and effectiveness leading to the diagnosis of 42% at Barcelona Clinic Liver Cancer stage [BCLC‐0/A]); S3, S2 with increased access (97%); S4, S2 with an efficacy of screening close to that achieved in a randomized controlled trial leading to the diagnosis of 87% of patients at stage BCLC‐0/A; S5, S3+S4. The analysis was corrected for lead‐time bias. Currently existing practices of HCC screening increased LE by 11 months and reduced HCC mortality at 5 years by 6% compared to no screening ( P  = 0.0013). Compared to current screening practices, we found that: 1) increasing the rate of access to screening would increase LE by 7 months and reduce HCC mortality at 5 years by 5% ( P  = 0.045); 2) optimal screening would increase LE by 14 months and reduce HCC mortality at 5 years by 9% ( P  = 0.0002); 3) the combination of an increased rate of access and optimal effectiveness of HCC screening would increase LE by 31 months and decrease HCC mortality at 5 years by 20% ( P < 0.0001). Conclusion : The present study shows that US screening for HCC in patients with compensated HCV‐related cirrhosis aware of their HCV status improves survival and emphasizes the crucial role of screening effectiveness. (H epatology 2014;59:1471‐1481)

This content is not available in your region!

Continue researching here.

Having issues? You can contact us here