Premium
Conjugation is essential for the anticholestatic effect of Nor Ursodeoxycholic acid in taurolithocholic acid–induced cholestasis in rat liver
Author(s) -
Denk Gerald U.,
Maitz Silvia,
Wimmer Ralf,
Rust Christian,
Invernizzi Pietro,
Ferdinandusse Sacha,
Kulik Wim,
Fuchsbichler Andrea,
Fickert Peter,
Trauner Michael,
Hofmann Alan F.,
Beuers Ulrich
Publication year - 2010
Publication title -
hepatology
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 5.488
H-Index - 361
eISSN - 1527-3350
pISSN - 0270-9139
DOI - 10.1002/hep.23911
Subject(s) - ursodeoxycholic acid , choleretic , cholestasis , chemistry , taurine , bile acid , taurocholic acid , biochemistry , lithocholic acid , bile salt export pump , apoptosis , medicine , pharmacology , amino acid , endocrinology , biology , transporter , gene
Nor UDCA (24‐ nor ursodeoxycholic acid), the C 23 ‐homolog of ursodeoxycholic acid (UDCA), showed remarkable therapeutic effects in cholestatic Mdr2 ( Abcb4 ) (multidrug resistance protein 2/ATP‐binding cassette b4) knockout mice with sclerosing/fibrosing cholangitis. In contrast to UDCA, nor UDCA is inefficiently conjugated in human and rodent liver, and conjugation has been discussed as a key step for the anticholestatic action of UDCA in cholestasis. We compared the choleretic, anticholestatic, and antiapoptotic properties of unconjugated and taurine‐conjugated UDCA (C 24 ) and nor UDCA (C 23 ) in isolated perfused rat liver (IPRL) and in natrium/taurocholate cotransporting polypeptide (Ntcp)‐transfected human hepatoma (HepG2) cells. Taurolithocholic acid (TLCA) was used to induce a predominantly hepatocellular cholestasis in IPRL. Bile flow was determined gravimetrically; bile acids determined by gas chromatography and liquid chromatography/tandem mass spectrometry; the Mrp2 model substrate, 2,4‐dinitrophenyl‐S‐glutathione (GS‐DNP) was determined spectrophotometrically; and apoptosis was determined immunocytochemically. The choleretic effect of C 23 ‐bile acids was comparable to their C 24 ‐homologs in IPRL. In contrast, T nor UDCA, but not nor UDCA antagonized the cholestatic effect of TLCA. Bile flow (percent of controls) was 8% with TLCA‐induced cholestasis, and unchanged by coinfusion of nor UDCA (14%). However, it was increased by T nor UDCA (83%), UDCA (73%) and TUDCA (136%). Secretion of GS‐DNP was markedly reduced by TLCA (5%), unimproved by nor UDCA (4%) or UDCA (17%), but was improved modestly by T nor UDCA (26%) or TUDCA (58%). No apoptosis was observed in IPRL exposed to low micromolar TLCA, but equivalent antiapoptotic effects of TUDCA and T nor UDCA were observed in Ntcp‐HepG2 cells exposed to TLCA. Conclusion: Conjugation is essential for the anticholestatic effect of nor UDCA in a model of hepatocellular cholestasis. Combined therapy with UDCA and nor UDCA may be superior to UDCA or nor UDCA monotherapy in biliary disorders in which hepatocyte as well as cholangiocyte dysfunction contribute to disease progression. (HEPATOLOGY 2010;52:1758‐1768)