Premium
Cefotaxime is more effective than is ampicillin‐tobramycin in cirrhotics with severe infections
Author(s) -
Felisart Josefina,
Rimola Antoni,
Arroyo Vicente,
PerezAyuso Rosa M.,
Quintero Enrique,
Gines Pere,
Rodes Joan
Publication year - 1985
Publication title -
hepatology
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 5.488
H-Index - 361
eISSN - 1527-3350
pISSN - 0270-9139
DOI - 10.1002/hep.1840050319
Subject(s) - cefotaxime , tobramycin , ampicillin , medicine , nephrotoxicity , gastroenterology , carbenicillin , cephalosporin , renal function , antibiotics , surgery , microbiology and biotechnology , gentamicin , kidney , biology
We compared the effectiveness and incidence of nephrotoxicity of ampicillin‐tobramycin and cefotaxime in 73 cirrhotics who had severe bacterial infection. Most of these patients had spontaneous peritonitis and/or bacteremia. Patients were randomly allocated into two groups. Group I included 36 patients treated with ampicillin‐tobramycin and Group II comprised 37 patients treated with cefotaxime. Patients from both groups were similar with respect to clinical data, standard liver and renal function tests, types of infection and isolated organisms. Ninety‐two per cent of bacteria isolated in Group I and 98% of those isolated in Group II were susceptible in vitro to ampicillin‐tobramycin and to cefotaxime, respectively. Ampicillin‐tobramycin cured the infection in 56% of Group I patients, and cefotaxime in 85% of Group II patients (p < 0.02). Five patients treated with ampicillin‐tobramycin, and none treated with cefotaxime developed superinfections (p = 0.024). Nephrotoxicity (impairment of renal function associated with an increase of urinary β 2 ‐microglobulin to over 2,000 μg per liter) occurred in two patients in Group I and none in Group II. These results suggest that broad‐spectrum cephalosporins should be considered as first choice antibiotics in cirrhotic patients with severe infections.