Premium
Endoscopic resection of sinonasal malignancies
Author(s) -
Abdelmeguid Ahmed S.,
Raza Shaan M.,
Su Shirley Y.,
Kupferman Michael,
Roberts Dianna,
DeMonte Franco,
Hanna Ehab Y.
Publication year - 2020
Publication title -
head and neck
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 1.012
H-Index - 127
eISSN - 1097-0347
pISSN - 1043-3074
DOI - 10.1002/hed.26047
Subject(s) - medicine , surgery , retrospective cohort study , cerebrospinal fluid leakage , endoscopy , complication , resection , significant difference , cerebrospinal fluid
Background In this study, we evaluate our experience and the outcomes of patients with sinonasal cancer treated with endoscopic resection. Methods Retrospective review of patients with sinonasal cancer who had endoscopic resection was conducted. The outcomes of interest included survival outcomes and surgical complications. Results Overall, 239 patients were included. Median follow up time was 46.6 months. Of the 239 patients, 167 (70%) had a pure endonasal endoscopic approach, while 72 (30%) had an endoscopic‐assisted approach. Postoperative cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) leakage occurred in 14 patients (5.9%). Negative margins were achieved in 209 patients (87.4%). There was no significant difference in the margin status between the pure endoscopic and endoscopic‐assisted group ( P = .682). There was no significant difference in the survival outcomes between both the groups. Conclusion Our data suggest that in properly selected patients, endoscopic approaches have acceptable morbidity with low complication rates and can provide an oncologically sound alterative to open approaches.