Premium
Head and neck cancer PEG site metastases: Association with PEG placement method
Author(s) -
Montes de Oca Mary K.,
Nye Anthony,
Porter Caroline,
Collins Justin,
Satterfield Corey,
Schammel Christine M. G.,
Trocha Steven D.
Publication year - 2019
Publication title -
head and neck
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 1.012
H-Index - 127
eISSN - 1097-0347
pISSN - 1043-3074
DOI - 10.1002/hed.25564
Subject(s) - peg ratio , medicine , head and neck cancer , percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy , surgery , head and neck , cancer , incidence (geometry) , radiology , physics , finance , optics , economics
Background Many patients with head and neck cancer (HNC) will require feeding tube placement for nutritional support using percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy (PEG) tube. Rarely, HNC metastases have been reported at the PEG site, a morbidity associated with a poor outcome. Methods Along with a case report, an evaluation of PEG placement methods with metastases from the literature was completed along with a statistical analysis of the literature to determine PEG site metastases and method of placement correlations. Results The incidence of PEG metastases in patients with HNC with the “pull” method is statistically identical to that of patients receiving any other method for PEG placement. Conclusions When considering options for the placement of PEG tubes in patients with HNC, the “pull” method should not be considered as a technique which will put patients at risk for PEG site metastases more than any other method of placement.