Premium
Evaluation of clinical presentation and referral indications for ultrasound‐guided fine‐needle aspiration biopsy of the thyroid as possible predictors of thyroid cancer
Author(s) -
AbuGhanem Sara,
Cohen Oded,
Lazutkin Anna,
AbuGhanem Yasmin,
Fliss Dan M.,
Yehuda Moshe
Publication year - 2016
Publication title -
head and neck
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 1.012
H-Index - 127
eISSN - 1097-0347
pISSN - 1043-3074
DOI - 10.1002/hed.24143
Subject(s) - medicine , fine needle aspiration , thyroid , thyroid nodules , radiology , thyroid cancer , bethesda system , biopsy
Background Whether initial clinical presentation and thyroid ultrasonography referral indications can significantly predict malignant/suspicious for malignancy (Bethesda System for Reporting Thyroid Cytopathology [Bethesda] V/VI) thyroid ultrasound‐guided fine‐needle aspiration (FNA) cytology results is unknown. Methods Between January 2010 and May 2014, we performed 705 thyroid ultrasound‐guided FNA biopsies, according to the American Thyroid Association (ATA) guidelines. Univariate analysis was used to identify significant predictors for Bethesda V/VI thyroid ultrasound‐guided FNA cytology, including age, sex, imaging modality, thyroid dysfunction, neck pain, breathing difficulties, dysphagia, odynophagia, fatigue, lateral cervical mass, parotid mass, and hyperparathyroidism. Results Sixty percent of patients were referred to thyroid ultrasound‐guided FNA because of thyroid incidentalomas and 40% because of palpable thyroid nodules found on physical examination. Only positron emission tomography (PET)‐CT emerged as being a significant predictor for Bethesda V/VI thyroid ultrasound‐guided FNA cytology (odds ratio [OR] = 5.64; 95% confidence interval [CI] = 1.16–27.33; p = .03). Conclusion Patient symptomatology and initial clinical thyroid ultrasound‐guided FNA referral indications cannot predict the nature of thyroid nodules. © 2015 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. Head Neck 38 : E991–E995, 2016