Premium
Intraoral lining with the fibular osteomyofascial flap without a skin paddle during maxillary and mandibular reconstruction
Author(s) -
Fan Song,
Wang Youyuan,
Wu Donghui,
Lai Dongli,
Feng Yuhuan,
Yu Xin,
Lin Zhaoyu,
Zhang Daming,
Chen Weiliang,
Liang Jianqiang,
Li Jinsong
Publication year - 2016
Publication title -
head and neck
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 1.012
H-Index - 127
eISSN - 1097-0347
pISSN - 1043-3074
DOI - 10.1002/hed.24109
Subject(s) - medicine , debulking , surgery , head and neck , fibula , free flap , maxilla , dentures , mandible (arthropod mouthpart) , deformity , dentistry , tibia , botany , ovarian cancer , cancer , biology , genus
Background To achieve an ideal intraoral lining, we harvest the fibular osteomyofascial flap to avoid the common embarrassment caused by the fibular osteomyocutaneous flap, and we report on our experience with this technique in this article. Methods Twenty‐eight patients underwent reconstruction of the maxilla and mandible using an osteomyofascial free fibula flap after oncologic ablation. Data, including the size of the fascial flaps, the number of debulking operations, the complications at both the donor and recipient sites, and the dental rehabilitation, were collected. Results All fascial flaps survived and were remucosalized, except one with partial necrosis. None of the patients in the osteomyofascial group required an additional debulking operation, and 82% of the patients (23 of 28) had conventional dentures and showed good chewing function and cosmetic results. Conclusion The fibular osteomyofascial flap yielded a more anatomic solution for oral mucosal defects, obviating the need for additional debulking and potentially reducing donor‐site wound problems. © 2015 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. Head Neck 38 : E832–E836, 2016