Premium
Benefits and drawbacks of open partial horizontal laryngectomies, Part B: Intermediate and selected advanced stage laryngeal carcinoma
Author(s) -
Succo Giovanni,
Crosetti Erika,
Bertolin Andy,
Lucioni Marco,
Arrigoni Giulia,
Panetta Valentina,
Sprio Andrea E.,
Berta Giovanni N.,
Rizzotto Giuseppe
Publication year - 2016
Publication title -
head and neck
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 1.012
H-Index - 127
eISSN - 1097-0347
pISSN - 1043-3074
DOI - 10.1002/hed.24064
Subject(s) - medicine , laryngectomy , larynx , stage (stratigraphy) , surgery , laryngeal neoplasm , carcinoma , paleontology , biology
Background Cancer of the larynx in the intermediate/advanced stage still presents a major challenge in terms of controlling the disease and preserving the organ. Among therapeutic options, open partial horizontal laryngectomy is proposed as a function‐sparing surgical technique. Methods We analyzed the clinical outcomes of 555 patients with laryngeal cancer staged pT3 to pT4a who underwent open partial horizontal laryngectomy. Results Five‐year overall survival (OS), disease‐free survival (DFS), locoregional control, local control, laryngectomy‐free survival, and laryngeal function preservation rates were 84.6%, 84.2%, 86.3%, 90.6%, 93.3%, and 91.2%, respectively. DFS, locoregional control, and laryngeal function preservation rates were significantly affected by pT4a staging (68.1%, 71.7%, and 78.0%, respectively), whereas pN+ influenced only DFS (≤72.6%) and locoregional control (≤79.6%). Conclusions Open partial horizontal laryngectomy with a modular approach can be considered effective in terms of prognostic and functional results in intermediate‐stage and selected advanced‐stage laryngeal cancers, even with subglottic extension. © 2015 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. Head Neck 38 : E649–E657, 2016