Premium
Role of endolaryngeal surgery (with or without laser) versus radiotherapy in the management of early (T1) glottic cancer: A systematic review
Author(s) -
Yoo John,
Lacchetti Christina,
Hammond J. Alex,
Gilbert Ralph W.
Publication year - 2014
Publication title -
head and neck
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 1.012
H-Index - 127
eISSN - 1097-0347
pISSN - 1043-3074
DOI - 10.1002/hed.23504
Subject(s) - medicine , radiation therapy , cochrane library , transoral laser microsurgery , modalities , medline , laser surgery , laryngeal neoplasm , treatment modality , quality of life (healthcare) , surgery , larynx , head and neck cancer , randomized controlled trial , laser , social science , physics , optics , nursing , sociology , political science , law
Background Treatment options for early glottic cancer include transoral microsurgery or radiotherapy (RT). There is continuing debate about which is the superior treatment. Methods The literature was searched from 1996 to 2011 using MEDLINE, EMBASE, and Cochrane Library. A quality assessment of each included study was conducted and reported. Results There is no evidence in favor of 1 treatment modality when considering likelihood of local control or overall survival. There is a suggestion that RT may be associated with less measureable perturbation of voice as compared to surgery, but no significant differences were seen in patient perception. The likelihood of laryngeal preservation may be higher when surgery can be offered as initial treatment. Conclusion For patients with early (T1) glottic cancer, treatment options include the equally effective endolaryngeal surgery, with or without laser, or radiation therapy. The choice between treatment modalities should be based on patient and clinician preferences and general medical condition. © 2013 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. Head Neck 36: 1807–1819, 2014